.pdf_2.png)
Marketing Mix Untuk Chronic Care: Dari Episodic Service Ke Relationship-Based Strategy
Abstract
Introduction: The shift in disease patterns from acute to chronic conditions requires a transformation in healthcare systems, moving beyond a focus on episodic service toward a sustainable relationship-based strategy. This study aims to analyze the differences between these two approaches and examine the role of the marketing mix (7P) in chronic care services. Methods: This study employs a qualitative approach with a descriptive-analytical design through a literature review. Data were obtained from scientific literature, regulations, and relevant reports, and analyzed using descriptive, prescriptive, and argumentative methods. Results: The findings indicate that episodic service is limited and does not ensure continuity of care, whereas a relationship-based strategy enhances patient engagement, treatment adherence, and clinical outcomes. The implementation of the marketing mix has been shown to support the development of more integrated and patient-centered service designs. Conclusion: Therefore, the implementation of a relationship-based strategy supported by the marketing mix is essential for improving the effectiveness of chronic care services and fostering long-term relationships between patients and healthcare providers.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
• Arifin, B., et al. (2022). Non-communicable diseases and health system challenges in Indonesia. The Lancet Regional Health – Southeast Asia, 5, 100079.
• Asmaningrum, N., et al. (2025). Continuity of care in Indonesian hospitals: Challenges and opportunities. Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Kesehatan, 28(1), 45–56.
• Berry, L. L. (1983). Relationship marketing. In L. L. Berry, G. L. Shostack, & G. Upah (Eds.), Emerging perspectives on services marketing (pp. 25–28). American Marketing Association.
• Berry, L. L. (2018). Relationship marketing of services—Growing interest, emerging perspectives. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46(1), 1–12.
• BPJS Kesehatan. (2021). Panduan praktis program pengelolaan penyakit kronis (Prolanis). BPJS Kesehatan.
• Coleman, K., Austin, B. T., Brach, C., & Wagner, E. H. (2009). Evidence on the chronic care model in the new millennium. Health Affairs, 28(1), 75–85.
• Gee, P. M., et al. (2015). The future of patient engagement: Technology and relationship-based care. Journal of Medical Systems, 39(10), 120.
• Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. (2022). Profil kesehatan Indonesia 2022. Kemenkes RI.
• Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing management (15th ed.). Pearson.
• Meiqari, L., et al. (2019). Patient pathways for chronic illness care in low- and middle-income countries. Global Health Action, 12(1), 1587649.
• Purcarea, V. L. (2019). The impact of marketing strategies in healthcare systems. Journal of Medicine and Life, 12(2), 93–96.
• Schröders, J., et al. (2017). Health system readiness for chronic disease care in Indonesia. BMC Health Services Research, 17, 546.
• Wagner, E. H., Austin, B. T., & Von Korff, M. (2001). Organizing care for patients with chronic illness. The Milbank Quarterly, 74(4), 511–544.
• Wagner, E. H. (2019). The chronic care model revisited. Healthcare, 7(1), 1–3.
• World Health Organization. (2015). Global strategy on people-centred and integrated health services. WHO.
• World Health Organization. (2016). Framework on integrated, people-centred health services. WHO.
• World Health Organization. (2022). Noncommunicable diseases country profiles. WHO.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52643/marsi.v10i2.8475
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 Jurnal Manajemen dan Administrasi Rumah Sakit Indonesia (MARSI)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
