Analisis Efektivitas Implementasi Problem Solving Cycle dalam Perencanaan Program Kesehatan Masyarakat: Literatur Review Konseptual dan Kontekstual

Indriyati Srikandi Putri, R. Ayu Laras Lestari, Christine Natalina Elysabeth, Budi Hartono

Abstract


This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of Problem Solving Cycle (PSC) implementation in public health program planning through a conceptual and contextual literature review approach. The main focus of the study is to examine how the literature conceptualizes power dynamics and contextual factors that influence the implementation of PSC, identify the determinants of the gap between planning and implementation, and examine the definition and measurement of process quality, participation, equity, and sustainability of outcomes. This study used a non-systematic literature review design for 26 SCOPUS and Web of Science indexed journal articles. Data were extracted using a synthesis matrix and analyzed through a narrative thematic approach based on key categories: power mechanisms, implementation factors, process quality, and sustainability. The results show that the effectiveness of PSC implementation is influenced by the distribution of authority, control of resources, institutional capacity, accountability mechanisms, and leadership support. The gap between planning and implementation was found to be a consistent pattern, especially in the context of limited resources and weak monitoring systems. Process quality, participation rate, and integration of equity considerations are related to the legitimacy and sustainability of results. This study emphasizes that PSC is a social process that is influenced by governance dynamics and organizational contexts, and requires strengthening capacity and accountability systems to increase its effectiveness

Full Text:

PDF

References


Altman L, Kuhlmann AKS, Galavotti C. Understanding the black box: A systematic review of the measurement of the community mobilization process in evaluations of interventions targeting sexual, reproductive, and maternal health. Eval Program Plann. 2015;49:86–97. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2014.11.010

Beck DC, Munro-Kramer ML, Lori JR. A scoping review on community mobilisation for maternal and child health in sub-Saharan Africa: Impact on empowerment. Glob Public Health. 2018;14(3):375–95. doi:10.1080/17441692.2018.1443652

Beck DC, Veliz PT, Munro-Kramer M, Boyd C, Sakala I, Chiboola N, et al. Exploring change over time in community mobilization domains: Results from a maternity waiting home intervention in rural Zambia. Int J Equity Health. 2021;20(1):228. doi:10.1186/s12939-021-01557-5

Central Statistical Office (CSO) [Zambia], Ministry of Health (MOH) [Zambia], ICF International. Zambia Demographic and Health Survey 2017–18. Lusaka: CSO, MOH, and ICF International; 2018.

Colbourn T, Nambiar B, Kim S, Bondo A, Banda L, Makwenda C, et al. Cost-effectiveness and affordability of community mobilisation through women’s groups and quality improvement in health facilities (Mai-Khanda trial) in Malawi. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2015;13:1–15.

Colbourn T, Nambiar B, Bondo A, Makwenda C, Tsetekani E, Makonda-Ridley A, et al. Effects of quality improvement in health facilities and community mobilization through women’s groups on maternal, neonatal and perinatal mortality in Malawi: A cluster randomized controlled trial. PLoS Med. 2017;14(6):e1002356. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002356

Costello A. The social edge: The power of sympathy groups for our health, wealth and sustainable future. Thornwick; 2018.

Costello AB, Osborne JW. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Pract Assess Res Eval. 2005;10(7):1–9.

Fixsen DL, Naoom SF, Blase KA, Friedman RM, Wallace FM. Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. Tampa: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute; 2005.

Gram L, Morrison J, Skordis-Worrall J. Organising concepts of women’s empowerment for measurement: A typology. Soc Indic Res. 2018;139(3):987–1003. doi:10.1007/s11205-018-2012-2

Gram L, Skordis-Worrall J, Saville N, Manandhar DS, Sharma N, Morrison J. “There is no point giving cash to women who don’t spend it the way they are told to spend it”: Exploring women’s agency over cash in Nepal. Soc Sci Med. 2019;221:1–10. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.12.019

Gullo S, Galavotti C, Kuhlmann AS, Msiska T, Hastings P, Marti CN. Effects of a social accountability approach, CARE’s community score card, on reproductive health outcomes in Malawi. PLoS One. 2017;12(2):e0171316. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0171316

Hay K, McDougal L, Percival V, Henry S, Klugman J, Wurie H, et al. Disrupting gender norms in health systems: Making the case for change. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019.

Howard-Grabman L. Demystifying community mobilisation: An effective strategy to improve maternal and newborn health. USAID; 2007.

Howard-Grabman L, Miltenburg AS, Marston C, Portela A. Factors affecting effective community participation in maternal and newborn health programme planning, implementation and quality of care interventions. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):268. doi:10.1186/s12884-017-1443-0

Kuruvilla S, Bustreo F, Kuo T, Mishra CK, Taylor K, Fogstad H, et al. The global strategy for women’s, children’s and adolescents’ health (2016–2030). Bull World Health Organ. 2016;94(5):398–400. doi:10.2471/BLT.16.170431

Lippman SA, Neilands TB, Leslie HH, Maman S, MacPhail C, Twine R, et al. Development, validation, and performance of a scale to measure community mobilization. Soc Sci Med. 2016;157:127–37. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.04.002

Matsunaga M. How to factor-analyze your data right. Int J Psychol Res. 2009;3(1):97–110.

Nair N, Tripathy P, Costello A, Prost A. Mobilizing women’s groups for improved maternal and newborn health. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012;119(Suppl 1):S22–5.

Prost A, Colbourn T, Seward N, Azad K, Coomarasamy A, Copas A, et al. Women’s groups practising participatory learning and action: A cluster randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2013;381(9879):1736–46. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60685-6

World Health Organization. Monitoring the building blocks of health systems: A handbook of indicators and their measurement strategies. Geneva: WHO; 2010.

Women’s groups practising participatory learning and action. Lancet. 2013;381(9879):1736–1746. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60685-6

Santelli J, Haerizadeh S, McGovern T. Inclusion with protection: Obtaining informed consent when conducting research with adolescents. UNICEF Innocenti; 2017.

Scott NA, Henry EG, Kaiser JL, Mataka K, Fong RM, Hamer DH, et al. Factors affecting home delivery among women in rural Zambia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):589.

Scott NA, Kaiser JL, Vian T, Bonawitz R, Fong RM, Ngoma T, et al. Impact of maternity waiting homes on facility delivery among remote households in Zambia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):526. doi:10.1186/s12884-018-2151-7

Tahvanainen H, Voipio-Pulkki L-M, Hämeen-Anttila K, Närhi U, Mäntyranta T, Holmström A-R, et al. Drawing up the public national Rational Pharmacotherapy Action Plan as part of social and health services reform in Finland. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024;24(1):631. doi:10.1186/s12913-024-11068-y

Tripathy P, Nair N, Barnett S, Mahapatra R, Borghi J, Rath S, et al. Effect of a participatory intervention with women’s groups in India. Lancet. 2010;375(9721):1182–90. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)62042-0

Victora CG, Barros FC. Participatory women’s groups: Ready for prime time? Lancet. 2013;381(9879):1693–4. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61029-6




DOI: https://doi.org/10.52643/jbik.v16i3.8307

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Indriyati Srikandi Putri, R. Ayu Laras Lestari, Christine Natalina Elysabeth, Budi Hartono

Flag Counter